
Knock on wood *knocks on wood* this 1 Ghz TiBook has not had the problems that my first TiBook did.
Of course I found out that my battery was stuck right when I needed to pop in a fresh battery. Always happens then.
I just had my first problem with my TiBook, and I did not have to send it to Apple. Thanks to Tom Folk at ITS. Its so great having an authorized hardware guy on campus.
The latch that slides open got out of whack, in such technical jargon. The top case had to be removed (ohh the bad memories) but the battery was ejecting in not time thanks to Tom.
The file/print/backup server had 128 MB of RAM. Thats not enough for Retrospect to run well. They are running ASIP (AppleShare IP) on OS 9 so 128 MB is not horrible, but for a file/print/backup server it is not enough. I added 1 GB of RAM today and it took little time to see improvements across the board.
They have a DDS-4 tape backup that is all messed up. I keep getting error 206 in Retrospect, dirty heads. After talking to Lacie tech support they suggest an company that does out of warranty repairs. It would cost a lot though, half the cost of the drive bought new. Their advertising department use a Zip drive to do daily and weekly backups. As much as I do not like Iomega (because of the "click of death") we are going to do the same for editorial. Getting a Zip drive and a pack of Zip disks is a lot less then getting the tape backup drive repaired. Also TCP's requirements do not require backing up gigs of data. They do not even back up 1 GB of data. So a Zip 750 will be enough for them now, and allow them a lot of room to grow.
The next task is to get a workable font solution. Right now there is no way to mirror all needed fonts on all workstations. There is Extensis Suitcase Server, but that costs $1000. They already own Extensis Suitcase Desktop Edition for all workstations though. After some thought, it will be cheaper to use Retrospect to mirror a master font folder to all the clients. Also having Retrospect on all clients will allow for backing up workstation files, something they are not doing. I found Retrospect Workgroup (good for 20 clients and 1 server) for a great price at MacMall (much better then buying from Dantz). And since we are buying everything else from MacMall, its easier then finding the absolute lowest price from a no name store.
I am now going to use Retrospect at Student Publications to blast out a master font folder for Unigraphics, Production, and all the other publications. We already use Retrospect Workgroup at Student Publications, I just never thought of using it this way. I must say this was not something I thought of, but something that came out of brainstorming at the TCP office. It was a happy little revelation.
E-mail users in the U.S. who have resigned themselves to being shocked by eye-popping pornographic messages in their inboxes can expect some relief Wednesday, when federal legislation governing sexually explicit unsolicited commercial ("spam") e-mail takes effect.
In April, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) adopted the rule, part of the 2003 CAN-SPAM Act, which requires spam containing sexually oriented material to contain the label "SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT" in the subject line. The FTC likened the requirement to putting an electronic "brown paper wrapper" around raunchy spam. Spammers who ignore the law risk fines, the FTC said.
The rule is designed to protect e-mail recipients from graphic and unsolicited sexual images. The labels make it easier to spot and filter out such messages before they land in a recipient's in-box. In addition to the label, explicit spam must include a valid postal address for the sender, the FTC said....
The final rule, which goes into effect Wednesday, reflects feedback from the public on the label, which was originally supposed to read "SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT-CONTENT," but later shortened to allow more of the e-mail subject line to be readable, the FTC said.
Yes, please, reading the subject "13 yr. old Lolita" is very important. Give me a break.
Source: MacCentral
When will this happen? I am not holding my breath. The sooner the better! Besides, do you realize how many alternates to "SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT" will be used? Lets take some guesses, shall we.
"SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT"
"S3XUALLY-3XPLICIT"
"SEXU@LLY-EXPLICIT"
"SEXUALLY-EXPL!C!T"
"S.E.X.U.A.L.L.Y.-E.X.P.L.I.C.I.T"
"S_E_X_U_A_L_L_Y_-_E_X_P_L_I_C_I_T"
"S E X U A L L Y - E X P L I C I T"
"S EXUA LLY-E XPL ICI T"
"SEXUA LLY-EX PLICIT df97s"
"!!SEXUALLY!!EXPLICIT!!"
"S[E]XUALLY-EXPLI[C]IT"
"SEXUA;;Y-EXPLICIT"
"SEXUALLY-EXPLI©IT"
"SéXUåLLY-EXPLICIT"
"SEXUALLY-EXPL1C1T
"Sexual:Explicit" (I got one of these today)
"SEXUALLY EXPLICIT" (I got one of these today)
See, they are not going to conform to a standard. I will add a few of these to SpamAssasin, and watch what all variations come through the pipe. I am very happy to see a few of my SPAMS even using this already. "Happy" and "SPAM" in one sentance, ugg!
Continue reading "Enter the Dragon Special Edition DVD Review" »
It is recommended that you backup your projects and reinstall Version Cue from the CD that came with the Creative Suite.
Click Continue to start the backup process.
I have, twice now.
I do not think anyone can get Version Cue to work. I got this above message after I:
Tried turning on Version Cue
Got a message that said it would not start up, told to look at the log file
Was asked, and accepted the offer for it to fix itself.
I hear it is a problem with using Tomcat. At least that is the only thing I can find on the multitude of boards I searched.
Lets look at that log file shall we (look in the extended entry)
Oh my, what? Error writing plist file? That couldn't be a file permission error could it?
I am trying one more time then giving up. It would be nice to have Version Cue to work for the different publications here. We will see.

Continue reading "Phishing scourge prompts calls for change" »
Continue reading "Saving Private Ryan D-Day Anniversary DVD Review" »